Adjective order and commas with “hair” English Language Learners Stack Exchange

Find the answer to your question by asking. It is, however, rare to hear people in the third category referred to as “aviators.” They meet the dictionary definition, and Wikipedia includes them, but in a separate list at the bottom of the page because they get in on a technicality. In most modern usage, ‘aviator’ is not typically heard much outside of academic settings, and is generally considered borderline archaic ‘Aviator’ is anybody operating an aircraft. I agree that “aviator” is a bit more old-fashioned.

What’s the difference between ‘aviator’ and ‘pilot’?

People would normally attempt to use, if possible, a genderless word so as not to cause possible offence, It isn’t that important, and some words can’t be feminised, such as the ones mentioned in the question. But these are not rules you can count on because “protector” can become “protectress” and don’t even bother looking for “actrix” in your spell check dictionary! If the word ends in “-ter”then drop the -ter in favor of “-tress” Words with distinctly feminine forms are usually old.

So in this case, the adjectives are NOT coordinate adjectives, and a comma should NOT be used. As for whether to use commas, and if using them, where to place them– If you mess with that word order in the slightest you’ll sound like a maniac. The aviator took the controls and piloted the balloon through the storm. Contemporary use of the -ette suffix for a female would be highly controversial if not borderline insulting.

There are a number of words you can choose here. First is “-trix” Best examples I can think of would be aviator/aviatrix and dominator/dominatrix. If they don’t, then they use the male noun for both genders. Idiomatic means that there is no firm grammar rule and you have to learn each one on a case-by-case basis. Does it always work like in the emperor and empress case, where the gender is somehow clearly distinct (at least for me) ? Is it always wrong to use, like, hunter for a female hunter too or sorcerer for a female sorcerer too and so on?

Are feminine nouns ending with -ess the only proper option for females?

But I’ve never heard feminine forms for writer, programmer, designer etc. So, generally the ending -ess means the feminine form. For example feminine from waiter is waitress, from actor – actress, etc. However, the use of the word “got” implies a more colloquial rendition, so I would not be totally against the non-comma version. In such a simple, unambiguous sentence it’s almost more readable without the commas though. With or without the commas, it’s unambiguous and completely understandable.

How can i get the right suffix?

• We cannot separate “mobile” from “phone” because the “mobile phone” forms a unit that “new” is modifying.
• There are a huge number of alternative noun phrases for this sense, based on what terminology is used for the spacecraft in question (for example ‘shuttle pilot’).
• In American English today, I normally hear the term aviator used to describe either someone who made a significant contribution to the field of aviation, or a military pilot (particularly “Naval aviator” or “Marine aviator,” since members of the U.S. Air Force are “airmen” instead).
• So, generally the ending -ess means the feminine form.
• Unfortunately English, especially Americanized English, has a tendency to outright steal words from other languages so spelling in English isn’t as easy as some more orderly languages.

Personally I like the two comma version the best, of the ones given. If it would require an “and” to clarify the meaning, then a comma is needed. We cannot separate “mobile” from “phone” because the “mobile phone” forms a unit that “new” is modifying. The sentence would still make sense if we switched it to either The aviator took the controls and navigated the balloon through the storm. The aviator took the controls and flew the balloon through the storm.

Adjective order and commas with “hair”

• Contemporary use of the -ette suffix for a female would be highly controversial if not borderline insulting.
• Aviator is now a more old fashioned term for pilot.
• The aviation industry directly borrowed the term from the maritime industry (and, originally on larger aircraft, did the same with term navigator).

In more technical terms, commas are used between two or more “coordinate” adjectives that modify the same noun–“co-ordinate” in that they equally/independently modify the noun. The general rule is that commas should be used to separate two or more adjectives that independently modify a noun. (1) Does the sentence still make sense if the word “and” is inserted between the two adjectives in question? So in terms of the word order alone, long straight black is fine. I think that whether or not the female -ess noun is used just depends on whether or not native speakers use that word frequently in the language. When we have a specifically feminine version of a noun which ends with the -ess suffix, like in huntress, sorceress, anchoress, etc.

When it needs to be unambiguous, this sense is usually called a ‘ship pilot’ or ‘maritime pilot’. In the past, the term ‘aviator’ could be applied to the pilot, the navigator, or the flight engineer. There are no rules pin up aviator game for learning them without just learning each word as you discover it.

What’s the difference between ‘aviator’ and ‘pilot’?

When it needs to be unambiguous, this sense is usually called an ‘aircraft pilot’, though it may be further qualified by the type of aircraft the pilot normally flies (for example ‘fighter pilot’, ‘cargo pilot’, or ‘bomber pilot’). There are a few other suffixes that indicate female gender but the rules of spelling get even more obscure. Some words in -er have feminine counterparts in -ress.1 And most words that end with -man can be feminized by changing it to -woman. Is there a rule by which a native speaker would create feminine forms?

These terms went obsolete so long ago that most people these days don’t even know that baker once had a feminine version. In other words, you can’t really go about creating feminine equivalents of random occupational words; you can merely use feminine equivalents, if they exist. Or is creating feminine forms simply not so important for native speakers?

Similarly, in the expression a Greek Orthodox priest, “Greek Orthodox” forms a unit that we cannot separate or change the order of; so no comma can be used between “Greek” and “Orthodox.” So here the adjectives are independently modifying the noun (that is to say, they are coordinate adjectives), which means that using a comma is correct. (2) Does the sentence still make sense if the order of the adjectives in question is switched? In American English today, I normally hear the term aviator used to describe either someone who made a significant contribution to the field of aviation, or a military pilot (particularly “Naval aviator” or “Marine aviator,” since members of the U.S. Air Force are “airmen” instead).

No matter the order, it all adds up to “long straight black hair” “The hair is black and straight, but also long”? “The hair is long and straight, but also black”, The situation with long straight black hair is a little more complicated.

Hot Network Questions

Is there a general rule how to create feminine words? I would leave out the redundant “got” and just say “I have long, straight, black hair.” Coordinating adjectives, which these are, should be separated by commas.

Unfortunately English, especially Americanized English, has a tendency to outright steal words from other languages so spelling in English isn’t as easy as some more orderly languages. Guess I’m just ‘old fashioned’. That having been said, I find a certain charm to gender specific terms. Note also that there is a tendency towards using one word for all genders. But for any given word, the only way to tell whether such a feminized version exists is to look it up in the dictionary. As with most things in English, no, there isn’t a general rule.